Saturday, December 17, 2011
Research on Music = AWESOME!!
Research Writing
Intersting Topics
Writng to your audience
Fads
What is to much?
Video Project
What is in that chicken nugget?
Proofread, proofread, proofread
Graffiti
Guest Speaker
Feminism
Advantages on working with a group to finish a paper.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Writing Group Papers!
With so many different ideas it makes things interesting because I realized that in order to have a successful research paper you need other people's point of views which makes a paper interesting. With these past papers I liked reading them more because of how each part was assigned to a different person and each had a different style of writing. I see now that although group papers may take a little more work to come together, it makes it easier as well in having a successful paper with people bringing different elements to the paper.
Monday, December 5, 2011
Group Papers aren’t So Bad After All
As a group there are many different opinions, as a group you can learn so much about each individual.When you work together your paper comes out stronger than it would when working by yourself. When there is more than one person working on a paper, there are many different outlooks on things. After finishing the two papers I have come to realize, Group papers aren’t so bad after all, it was actually very interesting. We all worked together and came out with a very strong intelligent paper.
Jasmine Farlow
Benefits of Writing a Group Paper!
There is an old saying “two heads is better than one.” Having more than one person working on a writing project increases the amount of combined knowledge of the authors. In areas of intelligence where one person is weak, others may be strong, and vice versa. If done properly, the collective intelligence of a group of writers can be a powerful resource.
Rachel Holland
About memes!
The relationship between the survival of a meme and these protests comes in the form of eviction letters given to the protestors to discontinue their movements and move out of the area. This clearly demonstrates the conflict a meme can endure through its process of development. Just as these protests are being noticed and becoming a huge ordeal, the government decides it’s in the best interests of everyone to knock them down, blaming them for uncleanly circumstances. As many of the protestors are standing strong, this truly will determine whether this meme of standing up for what’s right is to stay or go.
Jessica Young
Friday, November 11, 2011
Interpreting Graffiti
I think graffiti gives the artist a way to show their voice without anyone knowing who it is. It’s a way to show people who they are and what they stand for through art. Other times though, graffiti can be very hurtful depending on where it’s at and how people interpret it. For example, the graffiti that is on the desks in the classrooms can be interpreted as vandalism, art, and some may be offended by of it. However, I think its students boredom and they decide to doodle. It’s just like when you doodle in your notebook only it’s on the desk and some may feel that it is vandalism but I think if it was that big of a deal to the university or even students that something would have been done already.
Megan McCreery
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
On Pixie Dust
I think they matter shouldn't be how its done, but that it can be done and for what reason is it being done.
Candace Scott
Pixie dust and cloning: What are the boundaries?
Carin Shafer
Illustrations of Life: Tattoos
Megan Sowers
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Graffiti
I personally think that graffiti could be considered both vandalism and art. Some forms of graffiti can tell stories about life and personal situations. In other conditions, such as graffiti on school desks, I consider it vandalism.
Chrystal Eady
The Importance of Proofreading
However, when a writer publishes their work and a reader notices obvious grammatical errors or evidence of poor spelling skills, the reader will automatically assume the writer doesn't fully understand what they are talking about. This may be a false assumption, but when presented with sloppy writing, it is an easy assumption to make. A researcher may spend hours finding credible evidence to support their claim, but if they don't spend the same amount of time editing their draft, all that time and energy will be for naught. This is why I always re-read my drafts several times over, and even ask others to read my drafts for me in case I let anything slip by. I'm not trying to imply that everyone need be an exceptionally skilled writer. Everyone has their own talents and interests, and writing research papers is certainly not everyone's forte. That doesn't mean that as writers we should all be satisfied with producing carelessly proofread material. Try your hardest to produce the best papers you can every time, and as you practice honing your writing skills, you will become that much more trustworthy as a writer and researcher.
Emily Manno
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
The Use of Research Headings
For example, discussed in the rubric for Paper 2, the introduction was required to include, in addition with the researcher’s thesis statement, the research problem, significance, and research questions, which were expected to be clearly and explicitly stated. Throughout our high school years, we were familiar with generating research papers without headings. As a class, including headings in our papers threw most of us off, while confusing the way we, as researchers, generated our papers. Our writing techniques had to be adjusted in order to effectively meet the requirements, and it made most of us feel as though the paper was not a “real” research paper. Headings provide clarity, allowing the reader to clearly understand issues, as well as important points in which the researcher is trying to address.
-Jeffrey Fyock
Acknowledgments and Responses
In today’s class we discussed chapter ten in Craft of Research. The chapter dealt with Acknowledgments and Responses and how we as researchers must acknowledge and respond to our audience’s point of view. We then broke up into our five individual groups and discussed the importance of each part of the chapter to clearly explain acknowledgments and responses to our classmates. Group number three explained answering questions you can’t answer.
Group number three felt that not every researcher has the answer to all unanswered questions. Stating that it’s better to redefine or rebuild your argument or problem. Rather than discount your problem hoping that your audience will not notice. Another way to tackle this was to turn your disappointment into a victory. It may sound a little farfetched but you can turn the claim you at first desired into a hypothesis that your audience might think is sensible. Lastly every experienced researcher and professor will understand that everyone’s version of the truth is a confusing one, but they will acknowledge you for understanding your limits.
By Joseph Givens
Sunday, October 16, 2011
The Top 10 Inventions of all Time
Group one felt that electricity was the most important invention of all time, because you use it every day. Another reason we discussed was that a lot of inventions on our list would not be possible without electricity. Each group could reasonably argue if the top picked inventions were critical or not. In each group there were different ideas and opinions pertaining to the most important inventions. Possible research questions: How do I keep electricity going?How do I transfer electricity?How do I make different forms of it?How do I experiment with electricity?
Kristi Eileen Quinn
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Josh Readshaw said:
I really liked the point made about writing a research paper is being liek having a vebal argument with friends or family. In a verbal argument, you try yo persuade your opponent to believe that you stance on an issue is right and thier privious stance was wrong. This is what you do in a research paper except you don't get to see your opponent face to face. You have to try to convince them to believe your stance without you ever seeing them or them ever seeing you.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
On assembling reason and evidence
The same is true when having a verbal argument with friends or family. If you have no factual backdrop to support your claims you will lose and look like a fool. We can think of research and writing our papers as a matter of winning or losing an argument. The more evidence you have for your reasons makes you a much more persuasive person. Or in terms of writing, you will be able to prove your point (thesis statement) in your paper.
William Coyle
Friday, September 23, 2011
Problematizing for the Common Good
improve a research inquiry, but if the topic’s relevance is questioned, it may all be for naught.
It is here that the art of problematizing for research’s sake finds an application in daily life. As students move ever closer towards graduation, they become more specialized in the subjects prescribed by their respective concentrations, hopefully later applying this knowledge at a professional level. While this knowledge is often sequestered in the minds of those lucky enough to have studied it, it is no less applicable to everyone. As responsible professionals, whether health care providers, educators, businesspeople, or otherwise, it is a vital talent to be able to recognize a problem found in an area of expertise and adequately convey the gravity of such an issue to those not privy to or fully capable of interpreting this information. By sharpening this skill through researching and writing, students will be better able to shed light on problems they encounter as professionals.
Julian Chimelewski
Saturday, September 17, 2011
Stephen Hawking's Theory of Everything
We can use cost and consequence in every day life, just like many other theories that were read in “The Craft of Research. We can use this in presidential debates, when someone tries to explain their beliefs, or even when someone is explaining scientific data. What we as researchers need to do is focus on making our audience understand, give them knowledge, and make them happy in the process.
Keith Chappell
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
On KFCruelty!
Along with the example we used in class, we can use this type of tactic not only in research papers but in everyday life. For instance, we may use this tactic when buying clothes. When buying clothes we usually ask ourselves, "how will the outfit look on me, will it match with the other clothes in my closet, and how will people react to the clothes?" Although we may not realize it, we use this topic all the time in our lives.
Alexandra Marie Julian
Saturday, September 10, 2011
Research writing with an audience in mind
A way you could successfully present a topic to an attracted audience would be to do so in an interesting way: with assumptions, guesses, questions and unproven stories. By conversing with your audience at the beginning, they will become more engaged and well aware of your large familiarity with the subject and therefore be more inclined to accept your research and standing on the topic.
Meghan McMeans
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Developing a Research Plan
One way to begin a plan would be to start a rough outline of your research paper, meaning break it up in to different parts. Start with an introduction section, and then three body paragraphs, and give examples to the reason you chose those ideas. Once they are done, start on your conclusion to the paper. After you have finished the outline for the research paper draw up another plan, with this second plan go further into your research and find new ideas and new implications into the research paper.
Jonathan Pratt